The most underrated attraction in Italy is a takeaway counter selling fried rice balls, a fifteen minute walk from the Trevi Fountain. At least, according to what our users actually save when they're planning an Italian trip.

Here is the comparison. The Trevi has about 510,000 Google reviews. Supplì Roma has about 6,000. So the fountain is roughly 85 times better known. Yet, it only gets 2.6 times more saves.

Do that sum across nine cities and 743 well-known places and the same thing keeps happening. The Eiffel Tower has about 47 times more reviews than Carette, the café across from it on Place du Trocadéro. It gets 1.4 times more saves. Central Park has 40 times more reviews than Levain Bakery, and only slightly more saves, 110 to 98.

None of this is creators being contrarian. The Trevi gets filmed constantly, by 237 different creators in our data alone. People watch those videos and don't save the fountain, because they already know where the fountain is. What they save is the thing in the video they'd never heard of.

The nine cities

For each city, the place that gets saved most for its level of fame, and the place that gets saved least.

City Saved for its fame Skipped for its fame Gap
Tokyo ICHIRAN Shibuya Tokyo Big Sight 337x
Paris Montmartre Louvre Pyramid 149x
Osaka Shinsekai Bic Camera Namba 124x
Kyoto Yasaka Pagoda Gyukatsu Motomura 81x
Rome Supplì Roma Piazza del Popolo 42x
New York Levain Bakery Rockefeller Center 38x
London Horizon 22 Trafalgar Square 32x
Seoul Starfield Library Lotte World Aquarium 28x
Barcelona Montjuïc Sagrada Família 16x

Comparisons are made within a city, not across them.

Fame still wins on volume

In every city here, the most-saved place is still a guidebook name. The Eiffel Tower gets more saves than any café in Paris. It just gets far fewer than its fame would predict.

New York is a clean example. The Brooklyn Bridge leads the city with 144 saves and Times Square follows with 125, yet per review both trail Levain Bakery by a wide margin. The Statue of Liberty has 69 saves. Rockefeller Center, which has 200,000 reviews, has 70, and sits at the bottom of our New York list.

Nothing about that is a knock on the Statue of Liberty. It is a fact about what a save is for. Nobody needs a reminder that the Statue of Liberty exists.

The free viewing platform beats the paid one

London's most over-saved place is Horizon 22, a free viewing gallery on the 58th floor of a Bishopsgate office tower. It has 5,981 reviews and 81 saves. The London Eye has 200,000 reviews and 141 saves, so it wins on volume and loses badly once you account for how famous it is. Trafalgar Square sits at the bottom of our London list.

Seoul does something similar. Its top place is a library inside a shopping mall. Starfield Library has 6,368 reviews and 464 saves, which puts it ahead of most of the palaces.

Where creators and the guidebooks agree

In Japan, the top of the list and the guidebook line up almost exactly.

Rank Kyoto by saves and the top three are Fushimi Inari, the Arashiyama Bamboo Forest and Kiyomizu-dera. That is the guidebook list, in the guidebook order. Tokyo gives you Sensō-ji, Shibuya Crossing and the Tsukiji Outer Market. Osaka gives you Dotonbori, saved by 3,359 people, then Osaka Castle.

Then look at what slips in around them. Tokyo's seventh most-saved place is MEGA Don Quijote, a discount chain, ahead of Skytree. Kyoto's eighth is Otagi Nenbutsuji, a temple past the far end of Arashiyama with 1,200 moss-covered stone figures, saved by 1,635 people.

Our read is that this tracks how much of a city is locked up in monuments. Rome has a canon you cannot skip, so creators film the canon and viewers save the supplì.

What the skipped places have in common

Mostly squares, big stores, big venues and the most famous monuments. Trafalgar Square. Piazza del Popolo. Camden Market. Bic Camera in Osaka. Rockefeller Center. In Barcelona even the Sagrada Família lands here: it is the most-saved place in the city, with 168 saves, and still the least saved for its 326,000 reviews.

These are not bad places, and most of them are genuinely worth an afternoon. They are places that do not need a video to reach you. A save is a note to yourself about something you would otherwise lose, and Central Park is not at risk of being lost. It has 300,000 reviews, and 110 people saved it.

What to do with it

If you plan trips from social media, treat the canon and the creator picks as two different jobs. The canon will find you. The rice ball counter will not, unless you save it the moment you see it, with the reason attached.

That last part is where most people lose it. A screenshot gives you a picture of a plate. It does not give you the name, the street, the opening hours, or the line about going before eight because the queue turns the corner by nine.

Methodology

Every place here was saved to Plotline from a TikTok, Instagram Reel, YouTube video or blog post by at least 30 different people, and carries at least 5,000 Google reviews, so nothing in this study is obscure. A save counts only if the traveler kept the place: we leave out places turned down or never confirmed when importing a post, the sample places offered to new users during onboarding, places added by Plotline's AI trip planner, and Plotline's own accounts. We rank by saves per 1,000 Google reviews: the review count stands in for accumulated mainstream attention, built over a decade by millions of visitors, while saves measure what creators are pushing people toward right now. Comparisons are made within a city, not across them. Places are merged by name within a city, so a name with more than one Google listing there counts as one place, with its largest review count. Two entries were removed by hand: a perfume shop whose 20,184 reviews are far out of line with its category, and "Arashiyama" the district, which double-counted the Arashiyama Bamboo Forest inside it. Figures are current as of August 19, 2026 and cover 743 places across nine cities. An earlier version of this post counted the saves we now leave out, which inflated New York and London most; it was corrected on October 7, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most underrated attraction in Rome?

By our data it is Supplì Roma, a takeaway counter selling fried rice balls about fifteen minutes from the Trevi Fountain. The Trevi has roughly 510,000 Google reviews to Supplì's 6,000, so it is around 85 times better known, and it only gets 2.6 times more saves from travelers planning a trip.

Do travel creators recommend different places than guidebooks?

Not at the top of the list. In all nine cities we studied, the single most-saved place is still a guidebook name, from Sensō-ji in Tokyo to the Brooklyn Bridge in New York. The difference shows up once you account for fame: per Google review, a rice ball counter in Rome beats the Trevi Fountain, and a free viewing gallery in London beats the London Eye.

Why do famous landmarks get fewer saves than their fame suggests?

Because a save is a note to yourself about something you would otherwise forget. Nobody needs a reminder that Central Park exists. It has around 300,000 Google reviews and 110 people saved it, while Levain Bakery has about 7,400 reviews and 98 saves.

Which city has the biggest gap between fame and what travelers actually save?

Tokyo. ICHIRAN Shibuya is saved 337 times more for its level of fame than Tokyo Big Sight, the widest gap in the study. Barcelona is the narrowest at 16 times, between Montjuïc and the Sagrada Família.

How was this measured?

Every place was saved to Plotline from a TikTok, Instagram Reel, YouTube video or blog post by at least 30 different people, and carries at least 5,000 Google reviews. Saves count only places travelers kept, so places turned down on import, onboarding samples and additions from the AI trip planner are left out. We rank by saves per 1,000 Google reviews, comparing within a city rather than across cities. The study covers 743 places in nine cities as of August 19, 2026.